
"What's in a name? That which we call a rose, by any other name would smell as sweet."
Despite Juliet’s impassioned speech to Romeo, names can add color and feeling. The word, koru, for example, evokes far more mystery than fern.
Koru comes from
the Māori, descendants of New Zealand’s first human inhabitants, who arrived
from Polynesia during the latter half of the thirteenth century. Māori, which means normal or natural, expresses
their relationship with the land and that relationship is prominent in Māori
art. The koru, or unfolding frond, is
frequently seen in this art and symbolizes growth, harmony and life. Interestingly, kore means nothingness and is
part of New Zealand’s creation story, which claims that all life, even that of
the gods, sprang from kore.
Given this wealth of lore and meaningful names, I was
surprised to read that New Zealand had recently updated its list of banned names. Quite honestly, I had never realized that
they had one. While I might question the
wisdom of some names that parents bestow upon their children, I never saw it as
a matter for legislation. One of the principles
governing naming restrictions is that they may not resemble a title. Princess,
Duke and King have been banned. I've had dogs bearing those names and though I have never favored them as prospective
baby names, I wouldn't criticize any parent, who made that choice. Justice
and Majesty are prohibited for the
same reason. Names should not be
considered offensive by a reasonable person.
I’m not sure how that is determined, but Lucifer is not permitted. I'm tempted to note that millions of reasonable people have laughed over the antics
of Lucifer, the cat in Disney’s version of Cinderella. Is it only offensive for humans? Babies can’t be named Christ either, although I didn't see Jesus on the list.
Some claim the restrictions prevent parents from using names
that might cause future psychological harm to their child. I find it hard to believe that otherwise
healthy, happy children will be traumatized by a name. Possum
might not be a child’s name of choice, but it probably won't harm him. It might even inspire agile tree climbing or
the adoption of Possum Merino Clothing as a signature style. Remember that Johnny Cash song, A Boy Named Sue?
Parents determine their children’s educational institutions,
religious affiliations and medical care providers. They can raise them to be carnivores or
vegans. They can dress their infants in 100
percent cotton or polyester or Merino Baby Clothes, but they can't name them Jr or
Honour or MJ. I don't find that reasonable.
Surely, the government has better things to do with their
time than review name applications from prospective parents. How about better regulation and enforcement
of building codes and Home Insulation standards? Reportedly, over three-quarter million New
Zealand homes are poorly insulated and hundreds linked to illness and
death each winter. Surely that’s more relevant to a
child’s well being than any name. The
funniest and saddest part of this law is its inconsistencies. You can't name your child 4real, but Number 16 Bus Shelter is considered an acceptable moniker. Is this law 4real?
No comments :
Post a Comment